Punjab: Criticising Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal and his family for ignoring “taksali” (genuine) Akalis, Akali workers, leaders and supporters of the Barnala family (Surjit Singh Barnala, Governor, Tamil Nadu) today urged Barnala to quit as Governor to join active politics and lead Akali workers of the state.
Surjit Kaur Barnala, wife of Surjit Singh Barnala, said she would also ask Barnala Sahib to quit as Governor of Tamil Nadu to honour sentiments of the workers.
Akali supporters of Barnala family today attended the gathering but former Dhuri MLA and expelled SAD leader Gaganjit Singh Barnala (son of Barnala) was absent at the workers’ gathering, convened by his mother at the house of Barnala family here in connection with the revival of the SAD (Longowal). On the bsence of Gaganjit from the gathering, Bibi Barnala said he was out of station and would come by August 3 or 4 .
Two resolutions were also adopted by the gathering. Through first resolution, it demanded girdawari to assess the damage to crops due to recent rain for providing compensation to the farmers while by another resolution Surjit Kaur Barnala was urged to head the SAD (Longowal).
Bibi Barnala said in the SAD (Longowal), women wing, youth wing, farmers ‘ wing etc would be constituted. She also said the SAD (Longowal) would make efforts to get the SGPC freed from the control of Parkash Singh Badal. She also announced formal announcement, regarding the SAD (Longowal, would be made on August 20 on the death anniversary of Sant Harchand Singh Longowal at Longowal.
Former Punjab Minister Baldev Singh Mann said Parkash Singh Badal had done “injustice” to the followers of Sant Longowal, like him. He said they would never compromise with Badal. He also said the SAD (Longowal) would contest SGPC elections.
Karamjit Singh Sunam, Gurjant Singh Sidhu, Mohinder Kaur, Amandeep Singh Verka from Amritsar and former chairman of Barnala Improvement Trust Rupinder Singh Sandh were among the speakers .
Woah.. jackass…
“”””””””””””””””””””””””””in 1984 the emergence was right cause if it wasnt the millitary attack it would have been attacked by the millitants and the punjab state would have become khalistan…. which would have been a very small country with not enough to fill its citizens ..””””””””””””””””””””””
What do you mean attack by militants? Since you read the biography book of Barnala then i would suggest you to read some good non-biased book regarding the Sikh Freedom Struggle to get the first hand accounts and history of what happened 20+ years ago. Singhs never attacked nor did anything to get Khalistan. Singhs never wanted khalistan as declared in one of the few speeches by Sant Jarnail Singh Bhinderanwale. Stop believing in everything that Indian society teaches you. I would suggest you to read “The Gallant Defender” By A.R. Darhsi. Hindu person wrote this book and it is written in simple English.
All political party members are same whether it is badal or barnala. All belongs to Hell !
hey….
i guess u not living in punjab or in india even cause u dnt knw whats happening there….. badal has eatten the golden state of punjab… sukhbir badal also said few months ago that he will be the richest sardar in the world. you well can imagine how he can get rich… its not property its not his farm its corruption… where as on the other side barnala ji is a well repected person.. as i read his book …. he did some wrong to the sikh …so he went to golden temple amritsar to clean the shoes of the pilgrims and he was also tied to the pillar ..for ur reference there are pic of him in his book…where as badal the sr. turned his back and dissapeared for some time….
and in 1984 when barnalji became the cm of punjab ….the time was such that no one wantted to be the cm..spl mr badal
mr.barnala was also attacked by terrorist…many times…. where was badal that time….???????????????????????????That time badal was an amateur leader to take pangaas
in 1984 the emergence was right cause if it wasnt the millitary attack it would have been attacked by the millitants and the punjab state would have become khalistan…. which would have been a very small country with not enough to fill its citizens ..
well jagit singh you should read his book….
hope high for BARNALA SAAB
THERE WAS NEVER A THREAT TO S SURJIT SINGH BARNALA ANY BADALS OR NOR THERE TO NEED TO REVIVE AKALI DAL IF S. SURJIT SINGH BARNALA QUITS HIS POST BECAUSE OF NOT BEING APPLICABLE THE RAJIV- LONGOWAL ACCORD ON 26th,JANUARY, 1986 WHICH WAS THE DEADLINE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THAT ACCORD. DUE TO THE LUST OF POLITICAL POWER BARNALA COULD NOT DO JUSTICE WITH HIS DUTY TO DEFEND THE INTERESTS OF PUNJABIES OR SIKHS. SANT LONGOWAL HAS GAVE THE PRICE WITH HIS LIFE DUE TO THIS ACCORD. S. SURJIT SINGH BARNALA CAN BECOME THE SOLE LEADER OF PUNJABIES OR SIKHS IF HE HAD DID NOT DECIET THE PUNJABIES OR SIKHS. AB PASTAE KYA BANE JAB CHIRHIA CHUGG GAI KHET. IF S BARNALA WANTS TO BE IN ACTIVE IN AKALI DALL’S POLITICS FIRST HE HAS TO ADDMIT THAT HE HAS DONE A GREAT MISTAKE PERHAPES PEOPLE CAN FORGIVE HIM.